Skip to main content

The Cultural Value of Algorithms





I am aware that there are misgivings amongst the musical community about Spotify's business model, and from the bits I know, these are perfectly reasonable. Unfortunately, it is useful and productive consumer model, and it's this I want to briefly write at you about.

Spotify's catalogue is huge, an ever-expanding horizon that seems to want to engulf the soundscape in totality. It's easy to use, and you can usually find the album or artist you want to listen to. But it's true genius is in its algorithms, specifically the ones it uses to create the playlist it constantly nudges you to listen to.

Now, because of how pushy it seemed, I avoided my Discover Weekly and Release Radar playlist like the plague for ages. This was a mistake. Or maybe, because I hadn't listened and followed enough, they just weren't right for me yet. Now, however, I spend a good two days paying attention to them, and then expanding my aural sphere to at least 3 of the recommendations per week. When it learns what you like, the hit/miss ratio works very much in your favour, I find.

We all know the flipside to this: oh, it's gathering your data and learning about you! Panic! Horror! I'm not advocating we take leave of our senses and just hand over this sort of information about us to just anyone, but some amount of it is necessary. There's no way we can build the high sci-fi world of our dreams without it. By all means be wary of data nabbers, slurpers and peddlers, but also realise that it does help you in ways you easily overlook. At least 20% of the music I listen to on a regular basis has come from algo-generated suggestions, possibly more.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Alphabet Soup: A Quick Guide to Post-Nominals

This week, I’ll walk you through the ever-growing list of post-nominal letters you can add to your name through qualifications and certifications. Being a student myself, I’ll start with exploring the academic route, then go through the more popular, and best recognised, vendor and standards organisations’ certifications, highlighting their worth for your CV and career development. It’s not a comprehensive list, by any stretch of the imagination, and is geared towards a more general CyberSec professional, rather than focusing on any one aspect of the industry. I’ll try and shy away from too much debate by running away very quickly to avoid the one about CEH vs. OSCP, and leave it to you instead. *Disclaimer* I am a university student, and haven’t actually done any of the following certifications, at least not to completion. I have explored each in a reasonable amount of depth to see their benefits and worth and consulted with holders of a few to gain their insider opinions. I a...

The Ancient and Venerable Art of Google-fu

Other titles considered for this post: How Not To Piss Off Entire Forums and Facebook Groups; Avoiding the Banhammer; Stop Being Lazy and Look it Up Yourselves. Before you can embark on a career in, well, anything even vaguely IT related (or do practically anything), you must master one crucial skill: information searching. In the days of yore, and even rumoured to still exist despite budget cuts, there were in of cult of specialists in this area, who guarded their domains jealously: the librarians. These knowledge-fanatics could divine what you were looking for from the ridiculously poor and mumbled explanation you gave them, then translated that into a secretive code which led you to a shelf in a library, and then to the book you were after. Just like magic. These days, while librarians are still a vitally important part of cataloguing knowledge, we also have another, less mystical, tool at our fingertips: the Search Engine. Unfortunately, very few people have bothered to le...

Weaponised Likes

Yes, this is the inevitable blog about Cambridge Analytica, Strategic Communications Laboratories and Facebook, because this is a cyber security blog and this counts as compromised security. First things first, the old admonition: if you are getting something for free, you are the product. Maybe it’s not that old, but it definitely applies. Facebook offers a lot, and offers it, ostensibly, for free. Now you could say that advertising revenue pays for it, and to some degree you would be correct, but one thing the former Harvard female ranking website has plenty of is information: data. And data, particularly the specific kinds you feed the Zuckerbergian Machine every 30 seconds, is worth more than its weight in gold. Machine Learning and AI companies need as much as possible to teach their silicon brains, and advertising departments and companies love knowing how to manipulate you into buying things help you choose their products. Here’s where Cambridge Analytica, and their parent ...