Skip to main content

Multidisciplinarianism

Nice, long, big word there as a title. I'll shorten it for you: polymath. A person of wide knowledge or expertise. The desired human state.

I have long been an advocate for something I call wide-spectrum literacy: competence in reading, writing, arithmetic, science, technology, politics, philosophy, economics, to say the least. I have what you could mildly call a vehement dislike of ignorance, particularly wilful ignorance: I find little to no excuse for it, especially in developed nations where access to technological marvels which act as gateways to endless learning and knowledge, most of it free, is commonplace to the point of being carried around in pockets. You can imagine, then, my sickening disgust at the state of the world, and the horror of facing an international society in which ignorance, bigotry, and mendacity don't just roam freely, but are actively pursued as if they were the highest virtues. 

Now, I'm not going to lay the blame entirely at the feet of poor education, because that simply isn't true. How can it be, when I came through the same academic system as some of my peers who struggle to recall basic biology? That isn't to say the education system isn't flawed, far from it, however it does suggest that there must be other factors involved. Familial biases perhaps? I know it's no longer the done thing to blame the parents, but surely if they seek to take some of the glory of their offspring's achievements, then they should also should some of the responsibility for their failings, too?

We must also consider social pressures, as they have just as much power in the shaping of a mind as a parent or a school. While the lunacy of religion does seem to be waning, it seems other cult-like groups are springing up like weeds, and at much the same rate: pro-diseasers (I refuse to call them by any other moniker, call them what they are), flat earthers (we've got proof the other planets are round, but all evidence that earth follows suit is bogus, or has been tampered with, or otherwise doesn't fit my narrow bias), naturo/homeopaths (Avocados are great for making guacamole, so why hasn't David Wolfe been squashed yet?) and a whole host of pseudo-scientific/quasi-religious/kinda-spiritual bullshit. And with these lowest common denominator groups come the wide-smiled snake-oil selling celebrities, conning more and more people (who really, really should know better) into hanging on their every word and following each instruction as if given by a god.

Perhaps it's also political and economic: I'm sure we can easily point to elements within the executive and legislature who have overtly/covertly hinted that everything is worse because of that political party/that colour skin/those from country x rather that admit to screwing  you over, knowing full well that they've spent enough money on media, and removed enough funding from everywhere else, to make you believe it. And that's without accounting for the political/economic theory dedicants, those who worship at the temple of Friedman, Rand, Buchanan and Hayek. The truly insidious one who think money is all that matters, and unless you have it, you shouldn't have anything else.

These are just the obvious, flag-waving culprits of a dumbed-down, ignorant society. These, if anything can be called such, are the enemy.

Homo Sapiens Sapiens (that's us, by the way) are natural polymaths: we are born capable of having wide knowledge across many domains. It is crucial for own our development and survival that we exploit this fact about ourselves. Not only might it help us achieve our fullest professional potential, but also contribute to our personal happiness too. Stifling our own abilities starves ourselves of our need to freely be who we are, but could also starve the rest of the world from new scientific discoveries, technological marvels, artistic wonders and more.

It's also more than that: we are living healthier and longer. The implications for this are worrying, with unemployment being chief among them. There is a solution (it's not a perfect one, and perhaps not the most desirable one either): either we have a much longer one-track career, or we re-skill and have 2 full work experiences. 

There is invariably more to this than I can fit in this post, but I do think that this is the future. Exploit the polymath potential, and begin a whole new journey!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This is not a New Year’s Resolution

I'm not a one for resolutions or anything, I prefer to at least try to be a bit more practical than that. Instead, now that I've had time to consider what I want to do this year, here my list of upcoming projects. Let me know what yours are: 1) Re-evaluate the website and blog, and actually keep to a posting schedule. Might help if I started using artwork/photos. 2) Social Media application for my desktop: I'm getting a bit sick of having and average of 20 browser tabs open at a time, so lets see if I can't design an app, even if it's just a fixed browser thing, I can use to track my SM activity in one place so it's not clogging up my precious browser memory. 3) Stop wasting time with my writing projects: My biggest issue here is that while I can write some flowery prose or engage in worldbuilding like I'm Slartibartfast, I don't actually have a tale to tell. I need to adjust my focus here, and maybe I'll get something out of it. 4) Top Secre

The Cultural Value of Algorithms

I am aware that there are misgivings amongst the musical community about Spotify's business model, and from the bits I know, these are perfectly reasonable. Unfortunately, it is useful and productive consumer model, and it's this I want to briefly write at you about. Spotify's catalogue is huge, an ever-expanding horizon that seems to want to engulf the soundscape in totality. It's easy to use, and you can usually find the album or artist you want to listen to. But it's true genius is in its algorithms, specifically the ones it uses to create the playlist it constantly nudges you to listen to. Now, because of how pushy it seemed, I avoided my Discover Weekly and Release Radar playlist like the plague for ages. This was a mistake. Or maybe, because I hadn't listened and followed enough, they just weren't right for me yet. Now, however, I spend a good two days paying attention to them, and then expanding my aural sphere to at least 3 of the recommend

You and who’s party?

“I don’t care to belong to any club that will have me as a member” Groucho Marx Much of the past 17 years has been dedicated to fighting fundamentalist extremism, largely of the religious persuasion. This is understandable, as the religious mindset, certainly in those areas of the globe where faith is a majority holding, affects and informs the cultural values of society, and certainly in the West we have found ourselves at odds with extremist Islamic groups. Fundies of the Muslim persuasion have been at the forefront f these combative efforts, although we have also seen the dangers of the looming Christian theocratic state. It is fair to say while this will be an ongoing struggle, it is one we are coming to understand very well and are able to combat. But what of other types of fundamentalist creeds? What of political fundamentalism? This is, I fear, something we are neglecting to talk about, instead preferring to remain steadfastly tribalised to the point where discuss